I hate the phrase “living by faith”. At least I hate the phrase when it is used as a way to describe missionaries or other Christian workers who don’t have a regular salary, but rely on donations from friends, families and churches for their regular income.
I don’t like the phrase because it seems rather super-spiritual and, anyway, the Biblical picture is that we should all be living by faith in all aspects of our lives, not just the financial one. But this post is about finance, so I’ll stick to that aspect for the moment.
In the jargon, Sue and I live by faith; we don’t know how much money we will receive each month, but so far we haven’t gone hungry or failed to pay our bills, so God seems to be keeping things working. But what about the kind people who support us, some of them extremely sacrificially, what can they expect for their money?
Well, we can more or less promise that each day, Sue will knuckle down to working on translation issues in Madagascar and that slowly, but surely the Gospels will be published in yet another language. You can be pretty sure that I’ll spend part of the day staring at my laptop in frustration trying to write some words that will help people to think about world mission in new ways, on other days, I attend meetings and try to inspire, encourage and cajole people into different ways of working. A chunk of our support is spent on paying the TV licence, buying dog food and frozen pizzas for our Friday night tradition and I do have to own up to a very expensive running-shoe habit.
In other words, we spend the support in the same sorts of ways that other people spend their money, but it allows us to do jobs that are rather different to those done by most people. The generous support we receive allows us to do a certain type of work. What it doesn’t do, is promise that this work will have predetermined results. We can’t promise that thousands of people in Madagascar will read the Scriptures and have their lives turned upside down or that the British missionary movement will see a massive re-invigoration. We’d love these things to happen and we do what we can to create the conditions for them; but the ultimate results are out of our hands. In terms of final outcomes, we and our supporters are all living by faith. The Holy Spirit blows like the wind and can’t be controlled by our programmes.
The reason I’m highlighting this is that good fundraising techniques suggest that agencies wanting to interest donors (especially what are called ‘high value donors’) need to promise that the donor’s money will achieve certain ends. “Give us X dollars and Y will happen.” Worryingly, some Christian fundraising organisations seem to be falling into this trap.
OK, at one level it works. You can reasonably predict that it will cost a set amount to buy a new vehicle or to publish some books. But when it comes to ‘spiritual impact’ (sorry, horrible phrase), you simply can’t equate dollars in with the numbers of lives or communities that will be transformed through the message of the Gospel. It doesn’t work like that.
This sort of thinking can give rise to a horrible ‘race to the bottom’ as agencies and donors ‘compete’ to see who can achieve the most ‘bang for the buck’. A friend of mine was told by one funding agency that they would not work in his country, because people could be saved in another place at a lower financial cost. What? The cost for salvation was the death and resurrection of Jesus, to even think that you can put a financial tag on salvation is tantamount to blasphemy.
Sue and I live by faith because we don’t know how much money we’ll get this month. Donors live by faith because they generously entrust their hard earned money to other people in the hope that they will use it wisely. None of us can know or predict how God will use our time our energy or our finances; sometimes he brings amazing success and other times – for reasons best known to himself – he stretches our faith by long periods of apparent failure. It has always been so and it will continue to be so until the end of time; whatever the best practices of fund-raisers try to promise.
Any Christian agency that promises definite ‘Kingdom’ outcomes in return for a donation is fooling themselves and trying to fool you; avoid them.
</rant>
23 replies on “Donors Living By Faith”
Any agency that promises definite ‘Kingdom’ outcomes is fooling themselves and trying to fool you; avoid them. http://t.co/fdsyJUp9ac
Paul Bailie liked this on Facebook.
RT @kouya: Any agency that promises definite ‘Kingdom’ outcomes is fooling themselves and trying to fool you; avoid them. http://t.co/fdsyJ…
I’ve done a lot of thinking about this over the years – the most helpful thing for me has been the distinction between a salary and a stipend: a salary is money given as compensation for work performed; a stipend is money given so the recipient can do what they do without the pressure of having to go out and find a salary. It’s a strongly cross cultural approach, to value people for their life not just their work.
Of course the counter argument you get is “doesn’t that just mean giving our hard-earned money to people so they can have a nice easy life overseas?” (Usually from people who have not been overseas missionaries.) Well, possibly, but if you know the people you’re giving to, don’t give to people who aren’t serious about what they’re doing. But I think the vast majority of those who go into mission are.
Amanda Lannon liked this on Facebook.
Mark Woodward liked this on Facebook.
You are right about stipend Simon. Eddie is paid to be good, but most Christians are good for nothing.
To be fair, some donor agencies in the Bible translation movement simply tie “donations” to “number of verses translated,” though even that often doesn’t work out as advertised.
Others (maybe on a theological basis?) are convinced that making the Bible available in a new language is as much as God requires of us, and that He’ll take care of the impact. Hence they don’t hesitate to advertise a direct link between Bible translation and Kingdom impact. A rather bold expectation and link, and – if past experience is anything to go by – an expectation that has been wrong more often than right.
I was once given a hard time because a project I was involved in was not translating all of the verses that they were supposed to and not hitting targets given to funders. The fact that the primary translator had died in a traffic accident was apparently not relevant!
Ruedi Giezendanner liked this on Facebook.
Mark Meynell liked this on Facebook.
@kouya “buying dog food and frozen pizzas for our Friday night tradition” – ah, what fun for the lack of an Oxford comma!
Ashley Scott liked this on Facebook.
Ann Kuy liked this on Facebook.
Andrew Crozier liked this on Facebook.
Nev McCormack liked this on Facebook.
Junior Perkinses liked this on Facebook.
There is a very fine difficult balance between trying to report efficiency and effectiveness and making a promise. I first thought of this when reading a Bible League donation report that said, effectively, for every $5 donated, 1 Bible placed = _x_ churches and _x_ converts. I was recently reminded of it when reading ActBeyond’s own annual report. We try mightily to convey effectiveness but not make a promise as we know that only God gives the harvest. It’s a difficult road to get right, but we definitely shouldn’t make promises for God…
Tim Sutton liked this on Facebook.
Mike Fisher liked this on Facebook.
Sam Wuermli liked this on Facebook.
Dan Butler liked this on Facebook.
Ed Haussermann liked this on Facebook.