Standing Up For Our Rights

In the end, the best way to deal with injustice is to address the issue of sin and alienation from God that underpins the corrupt societies that we all live in.

There has been an interesting little cross-cultural struggle in the media this week. Air France are about to restart flights to Teheran and they will be requiring that female flight crew wear head scarves while they are in the city. However, true to their French secular standards, the union representing the flight crew have said this is unacceptable and for a while there was a stand-off between management and union which threatened the potentially lucrative new route. However, a compromise has been reached and the story is likely to fade from our front pages pretty soon.

However, while this story has appeared and then disappeared from the world of aviation inside a week, it is has a long history in Christian mission. Paul addressed the very same issue in 1 Corinthians 9:

21 To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. 23 I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.

While it might be appropriate for Air France employees to avoid observing local customs, the options for Christian missionaries are much rather more clear cut. If we are to win people for Christ, then we need to cross over into their world so that we can get a hearing. This means that in some parts of the world, female missionaries will need to wear headscarves. Now, to some people (including a lot of Air France flight crew) this might seem as an intrusion into personal freedom.

At this point, I ask what does personal freedom and choice have to do with mission work? We are servants of a crucified saviour and we are called to take up our cross and follow him. In practical terms this can mean different things to different people, but it always means that our personal freedom is not a top priority. After all, if Timothy was prepared to be circumcised as an adult so as not to offend people, then we can expect a degree of personal discomfort, too. If your right to make choices about your dress and other habits is a high priority for you, then you probably shouldn’t consider a career in cross-cultural mission.

To which you might reply that forcing women to wear a head scarf is unjust and prejudicial to half of the human race and that Christians should stand against this sort of injustice.

Yes, I would agree, sort of. Christians should protest against injustice and they should work for a more equitable and fair world. There are times when it is important to take symbolic, prophetic acts which reveal the underlying issues and corruption and which point to a better future. However, I’m not convinced that a female missionary refusing to wear a headscarf would fit into that category. It’s more likely just to be seen as a lack of respect.

In the end, the best way to deal with injustice is to address the issue of sin and alienation from God that underpins the corrupt societies that we all live in. This means taking steps to make sure that people can hear God’s Word in a way that speaks to them and it may mean that we have to park our own preferences and comfort on one side for a while.

 

This post is more than a year old. It is quite possible that any links to other websites, pictures or media content will no longer be valid. Things change on the web and it is impossible for us to keep up to date with everything.

2 replies on “Standing Up For Our Rights”

This is really interesting Eddie. Do you have any thoughts on how Christian women who (by virtue of their identity are missionaries and) live in predominantly Muslim neighbourhoods within in the UK might best handle this? Having been in this situation for a few years I found that I felt more authentic bearing witness to the freedom I have in Christ and dressing pretty much as I otherwise would – but that certainly makes me stand out from people around me. Some people (men and women) engaged warmly with me; others simply saw me (I felt) as from another culture and therefore not someone they needed/wanted to connect with – but I’m not sure that changing the way I dressed would have changed that, unless I had also inter-married, giving me a reason to do so that would have made sense to them. I realise this is very different to the situations you’re alluding to but would be interested to know what you think…

Hi Heather, in practical terms, I think that there are numerous answers to your question and they will depend on things the cultural background of the people you are working amongst. However, I think that there are a number of principles that are important.

Firstly, there is the obvious point that in a broadly British context there is less cultural pressure to adopt one form of dress over another.

Secondly, I’d go back to the point of my original post and say that we have to be willing to sacrifice what we see as our rights in order to share the Gospel – so there may be a case for adopting a particular dress code.

The issue of ‘freedom in Christ’ is an important one and I see where you are coming from. The other side of the coin, is that western dress has become associated (in some peoples’ minds) with behaviour that is far from Christian.

Jennifer makes some good points in her comment from a Nigerian situation, which are relevant to the wider world.

Comments are closed.