Eddie and Sue Arthur

Five Questions We’d Rather Not Answer

There are some amazing, creative, exciting and encouraging things happening in the British missionary movement. However, I would argue, that overall, things are far from rosy. We are in the middle of a period of massive change for the church in the UK and worldwide, and we are not keeping up with what is happening; our structures and practices, all too often, do not reflect the realities of the world we live in today – much less the world of tomorrow.

These five (rather leading) questions all raise issues that I believe are key to our future. I have opinions on most of them – which are reflected, as often as not, in the way I pose them – but no definite answers. I would suggest that these questions (or others like them) should be on the agenda of every mission agency board and church mission committee.

Do We Have Too Many Mission Agencies? No one knows how many mission agencies there are in the UK. The Global Connections website lists around 150, but not all agencies are members of GC. What we do know is that many agencies overlap in their areas of interest and geographical base and that they are all struggling to raise support from a shrinking constituency. This graph illustrates the problem.

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 07.45.06

Of course, the supporters of every agency can give good reasons why their favourite needs to continue, but we need some sort of joined up thinking across the board to address this issue.

What Happened To Proclamation? I’ve blogged on this a number of times (including this recent post), so I won’t go into detail here. Basically, my observation of the British scene is that proclamation of the Gospel is no longer a priority in world mission work. I’m not knocking those who advocate the relief of poverty, the search for justice and such like; these things are important. However, when proclamation gets squeezed out, something is seriously wrong.

Why East Africa? I’ve lost count of the number of church leaders who have told me that their church has a link with a church or diocese somewhere in East Africa, but I meet very few who have similar links in, say, Central African Republic, Turkmenistan or Mongolia. We put a massive amount of effort into the old British Colonies, where the church is often thriving, but much less into uncomfortable and dangerous places where people don’t know Jesus.

Why Overseas Mission? Let’s face it, things are tough for the church in the UK, we have massive needs in our own country, so why should we expend energy outside of our borders when there is so much need here. Increasingly, the word ‘mission’ is being used to describe what we do in our home towns and has nothing to do with the rest of the world; is this the way forward?

How Do We Change? There is nothing new in this blog post, I’ve written about them and raised the same questions in churches, conferences and gatherings of mission leaders. We know that there are issues but we seem unable to get to grips with them.

This post is more than a year old. It is quite possible that any links to other websites, pictures or media content will no longer be valid. Things change on the web and it is impossible for us to keep up to date with everything.

2 Comments on “Five Questions We’d Rather Not Answer

  1. I do understand the concerns about an over-emphasis on East Africa, and obviously as a missionary in Uganda I may be accused easily of being ‘biased’ here, but given Eddie how much you rightly emphasise the importance of all Christians doing mission to all Christians, isn’t a strong missionary presence in East Africa part of an important effort to help black, bantu-speaking Africans reach out to Somalia, DRC, S.Sudan, Sudan, parts of Ethiopia, and other regions where it is far harder for Westerners to go to? Furthermore, I challenge anyone who spends several years here in Uganda to say that the church is ‘thriving’….there’s so much more than census statistics going on here.

    • Hi Chris, you win! I’ve got quite a few friends working in East Africa and I wondered who would be the first to comment.

      I heartily agree with your comment and might well have said something similar myself, but I wanted to keep the post to a reasonable length. There is a place for mission to East Africa and I would argue that most of it should be along the lines that you have sketched out; building up the church and helping it get involved in mission. My problem is not so much that we do mission to East Africa, it’s that we end up not doing it in other places because of the amount of effort we put into this one corner of the globe.

  2. Pingback: Answering 5 questions we’d rather not answer | The Fine Print

  3. Pingback: Should ActBeyond exist? | The Fine Print

scriptsell.neteDataStyle - Best Wordpress Services