You know I’ve struggled with being called a missionary. I’ve even questioned why my sending organization calls us missionaries.
Interestingly, I came across an article in a secular newspaper that talks about SIL, the organisation with whom David works in South Africa. The article focusses on the production of the Ethnologue, a catalogue of the world’s languages, but also touches on the issue of the use of the term ‘missionary’.
But if Ethnologue’s working method hasn’t changed in the last half-century, the image it projects to the outside world has. The Grimes had no objection to calling themselves missionaries, but Lewis’s generation is squeamish about the label. “The stereotype is not one we want to own,” he says. “We describe ourselves as linguists, translators, development workers, and we do it as a faith-based organisation and out of a Christian motivation.”
I know that in the UK, the term missionary carries with it a number of connotations which are far from positive and people are increasingly shying away from it. That being said, I’m not sure that we have come across an alternative that can easily be used in its place.
I think it is important to note that there is nothing particularly sacred about the term missionary. It doesn’t have a particularly long history in the Church. As long as Christians are witnessing to Christ and making disciples, it doesn’t particularly matter what term is used to describe the activities.