Mission Ain’t What It Used To Be

The meaning of the word mission has shifted in the past few years and that has brought us a couple of significant problems.

People like me spend ages banging on about how world mission has changed. The global nature of Christianity has changed and we need a radical paradigm shift in how we think about world mission and, especially, how we go about doing it. The problem is, at the same time, the meaning of the word “mission” has been undergoing a shift which has changed the game for all of us.

To put it crudely, “mission” used to be what happened overseas, while the church did “evangelism” at home. This dichotomy was never an accurate one and over the last few years, in the face of the increasing secularisation of the West, churches have started to talk more and more about “mission” as a home based activity.

In theory, I don’t have a problem with this; we are called to bear witness to Jesus wherever we are be that High Wycombe or the ends of the earth. However, in practice, I have two big concerns.

The first is that the concept of mission as witness to Christ is being watered down. I recently had a reason to look at the website for a church in the South East of England. Splashed all over the front page was publicity for their big mission project. “Woohoo”, though I, “this will be good!” To say that I was disappointed to discover that all they were doing was building a new building is an understatement. A building is not a mission project, it’s a building! Buildings may be used for mission – and in some churches they are, but buildings can also be places that Churches use to retreat from any real engagement with the outside world. When we’ve got to the point where we can describe putting up a building as “mission” we have robbed the word of any real meaning.

The second problem is that as we start to talk about “mission” as a home based activity, we are losing the international dimension. Yes, we need to do “mission” in the UK, I’m all for it, but if we lose sight of the rest of the world, we are not getting to grips with our full calling from Christ. If your church has a mission to its local area but no mission to the wider world, it’s a bit like going to McDs and ordering a bun without the burger, salad and pickles. You are getting something right, but it is far from the full story.

This post is more than a year old. It is quite possible that any links to other websites, pictures or media content will no longer be valid. Things change on the web and it is impossible for us to keep up to date with everything.

3 replies on “Mission Ain’t What It Used To Be”

Hi Eddie, I always talk about Jerusalem, Judea,Samaria and the ends of the earth when i teach young people about mission to get them to think wider and wider about mission. When I was younger the problem was people thought of mission as something you went and did overseas rather than stayed and did. Think its important that we help people grow as missional disciple who are prepared to go or stay wherever God leads. And who understand what mission is!
God bless,

Great to hear that, John. Sadly, you are part of a diminishing breed in my experience.

Some of us feel the need to keep speaking out on behalf of those who have no Bible, no books, no churches, or at least very few of these. I struggle during the times I sit in a church meeting which over-emphasises ‘the mission field on our doorstep’ when that particular doorstep already has 5 or 6 evangelical churches within one mile, as well as several Theological Colleges, Bible Colleges and Christian bookshops nearby. What about those who have only crumbs, in the more dangerous parts of the world? Surely more of our resources should be channeled in that direction?

Comments are closed.